Friday, July 15, 2011

Is There Proof That We Are All Psychic?

'Up to 85 per cent of people may be clairvoyant' says a researcher
By Danny Penman / Source: Daily Mail



Dr Chris Roe places a pair of enormous fluffy earphones over the head of a blonde 20-year-old woman.
He carefully slices a ping-pong ball in half and tapes each piece over her eyes.
Then he switches on a red light that bathes the woman in an eerie glow, and leaves the room.
After a few moments, a low hum begins to fill the laboratory and the woman begins smiling sweetly to herself as images of distant locations start to pass through her mind.
She says she can sense a group of trees and a babbling brook full of boulders.
Standing on a boulder is her friend Jack. He's waving at her and smiling. She begins to describe the location to Dr Roe.
Half a mile away, her friend Jack is, indeed, standing on a boulder in a stream.
Somehow, the woman has been able to "see" Jack in her mind's eye, even though all of conventional science - and common sense - says it is impossible.
Is this simply a bizarre coincidence?
Or could it be proof that we all possess psychic powers of the type popularised in such films as Minority Report?
Up to 85 percent are Clairvoyant
That is what Dr Roe is investigating. A parapsychologist based at the University of Northampton, he is examining whether it could indeed be possible to project your "mind's eye" to a distant location and observe what is going on - even if that place is hundreds of miles away.
And though the research is not yet complete, the results have been tantalising.
His early findings suggest that up to 85 per cent of people may possess some form of clairvoyance - the ability to "remote view".
And he believes that with only a modicum of training we can all sharpen our psychic skills.
"Our results are significant," says Dr Roe.
"They suggest that remote viewing, or clairvoyance, is something that should be taken seriously."
It would be easy to dismiss such claims as laughable, were it not for the fact that an increasing number of scientists are taking them seriously.
While Dr Roe's work may appear controversial, he is starting to garner the support of eminent academics such as Professor Brian Josephson, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist from Cambridge University, who says: "The experiments have been designed to rule out luck and chance. I consider the evidence for remote viewing to be pretty clear-cut."
The Military and Psychic Phenomena
The military is also taking a keen interest. The Ministry of Defence takes the phenomena seriously enough to have commissioned its own research.
Documents only recently released under the Freedom of Information Act detail a series of experiments on psychic phenomena.
Unfortunately, the actual details of the experiments that were carried out - and what the conclusions were - are still classified, and intriguingly the MoD refuses to say whether they were a success.
They claim that releasing such details would imperil the defence of the nation, and what little information has been released is described as "poor quality" by Dr Roe.
"Their analysis of the data is quite frankly, woeful," he says.
But the very existence of such files suggests that the military are taking the possibility of psychic phenomena seriously.
In fact, most existing scientific knowledge on clairvoyance is based on other recently declassified military research undertaken in America during the Cold War.
During the Sixties and Seventies, paranoia gripped the US military establishment.
Strange rumours began circulating that the Russians had found a way of harnessing psychic powers and begun wielding them as weapons.
Psychic skills such as telekinesis - the ability to move objects or control machines using nothing more than the power of the mind - were apparently being taught to soldiers in elite combat units.
They were also said to be using clairvoyants to gather intelligence from top-secret American bases.
If true, the American's believed, it would mean that the Russians could discover their most important secrets and even control the minds of their Generals.
So in the early Seventies, the US military began its own top-secret research to try to close the "psychic intelligence gap" with the Russians.
The CIA later joined them in a series of covert research projects that were given suitably innocuous titles such as Sun Streak, Grill Flame and Star Gate.
These were designed to track down the most gifted psychics in the U.S., unravel the mysteries of their powers and then find ways of teaching these skills to ordinary soldiers and agents.
The aim was to produce a new breed of "super-soldier" capable of controlling matter with their minds and gathering intelligence from afar.
But some in the military wanted to go even further.
The US Navy wanted to send confidential orders to their nuclear submarines using telepathy, which would be impossible for even the most sophisticated enemy listening devices to intercept.
And Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III, commanding officer of the US Army Intelligence and Security Command, suggested that one day soldiers might even be able to "walk through walls", using psychic powers to overcome the physical boundary.
And if that wasn't enough, researchers at Princeton University (where Einstein was once based) and Stanford were similarly tasked with investigating the paranormal.
Scientists at Stanford quickly focused on the use of clairvoyance, known as remote viewing in technical parlance, as the most militarily useful psychic skill.
Very soon, Stanford played host to more than a dozen psychic spies, whose paranormal skills were once demonstrated to President Jimmy Carter.
The remote viewers used a deceptively simple method based on what is known as the Ganzfeld technique to help "see" deep into enemy territory.
They induced an altered state of consciousness by seating themselves in a sound-proof room and wearing earphones playing white noise.
Pingpong balls sliced in half were placed over their eyes to obscure vision. The whole room was then bathed in soft red light.
The map coordinates of the "target" location would be written on a piece of paper, placed in an envelope and handed to the viewer.
He would be allowed to touch the envelope but forbidden to open it. Alternatively, pictures of the target location would be sealed in the envelope.
The remote viewers would then slip into a light meditative trance and their "mind's eye" would be drawn to the target location.
Pictures, feelings and impressions would then drift into their minds from the target, which might be located thousands of miles away.
To an outsider, this approach might appear to produce only hopelessly vague results that were no better than guesswork.
But the scientists investigating remote viewing found them to be surprisingly accurate, giving military intelligence a small but significant advantage over their cold war enemies.
Psychic Spies: The Birth of Remote Viewing
Joe McMoneagle was one such "psychic spy". Given the codename "Remote Viewer No 1", his primary role was to use remote viewing to look inside Russian military bases and gather intelligence.
McMoneagle was recruited from US Army intelligence in Vietnam because of his amazing ability to survive while on reconnaissance missions behind enemy lines against seemingly impossible odds.
His commanding officers thought he was either amazingly lucky, psychic - or a double agent.
On his return home, he was tested for his remote-viewing skills at Stanford and found to have psychic gifts.
He went on to spend the next 20 years tracking Russian nuclear warheads and gathering intelligence.
His work eventually earned him the Legion of Merit, America's highest military non-combat medal.
"My success rate was around 28 per cent," says McMoneagle.
"That may not sound very good, but we were brought in to deal with the hopeless cases.
"Our information was then cross-checked with any other available intelligence to build up an overall picture. We proved to be quite useful 'spies'."
Word of America's experiments with the paranormal spread to the UK and while the military were sceptical, the Metropolitan Police spotted an intriguing possibility.
Could psychic powers be harnessed to help solve crimes?
They soon had their answer when a woman named Nella Jones came to their attention, claiming that she could help locate a priceless Vermeer painting, called The Guitar Player, that had been stolen from Kenwood House in North London in 1974.
Nella told the police that she had been ironing some clothes and idly watching the television when her mind suddenly focused on the whereabouts of the painting.
She hurriedly sketched it out and took it to the police, who were understandably sceptical.
But having nothing else to go on they followed the lead. The painting was eventually recovered from St Bartholomew's churchyard as a result of the information she gave them.
Again, it would be easy to dismiss Nella's guidance to the police as just blind luck.
Easy, that is, if she hadn't spent the following 20 years helping them ensnare murderers and other serious offenders.
"Nella gave invaluable assistance on a number of murders," says Detective Chief Inspector Arnie Cooke. "Her evidence was not the type you can put before a jury. But senior investigating officers have got to take people like her on board and accept what they are saying."
In fact, so useful was Nella to Scotland Yard that in 1993 they publicly thanked her and senior officers hosted a dinner in her honour.
Scotland Yard later wrote to her, saying: "Some police officers may have seemed sceptical of your abilities ... but it is a mark of those abilities that police turn to you time and time again."
Such anecdotes are all very well but there is statistical evidence, too, that proves that psychic skills are a useful tool for law enforcement agencies and the military.
In 1995, the US Congress asked two independent scientists to assess whether the $20 million that the government had spent on psychic research had produced anything of value. And the conclusions proved to be somewhat unexpected.
Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, discovered that remote viewers were correct 34 per cent of the time, a figure way beyond what chance guessing would allow.
She says: "Using the standards applied to any other area of science, you have to conclude that certain psychic phenomena, such as remote viewing, have been well established.
"The results are not due to chance or flaws in the experiments."
Of course, this doesn't wash with sceptical scientists.
More Evidence Needed
Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, refuses to believe in remote viewing.
He says: "I agree that by the standards of any other area of science that remote viewing is proven, but begs the question: do we need higher standards of evidence when we study the paranormal? I think we do.
"If I said that there is a red car outside my house, you would probably believe me.
"But if I said that a UFO had just landed, you'd probably want a lot more evidence.
"Because remote viewing is such an outlandish claim that will revolutionise the world, we need overwhelming evidence before we draw any conclusions. Right now we don't have that evidence."
Back at the University of Northampton, Dr Chris Roe hopes he can provide such proof one way or the other.
Next month, he will embark on a series of experiments that will be more rigorous than any so far attempted.
They will rule out fluke positive results and any unconscious biases held by anyone involved with the experiments.
And if that wasn't enough, he then plans to embark on research into an even more outlandish field: whether it is possible to remote view through time.
In other words, he will investigate whether it is possible for remote viewers not only to observe distant locations, but also to see what will happen at that place at a predetermined time in the future.
"Time does not seem to be a barrier to remote viewing," says Dr Roe, matter of factly.
Certainly, only time will tell whether he has been cruelly deluded, or has glimpsed a very intriguing future.

RELATED ARTICLE: The Quantum Physics of Remote Viewing

Why You Have Psychic Powers

By Jim Francis / Source: Real Mind Power Secrets
This concept of intelligence existing "outside" the physical confines of the living organism has been hard for the scientific community to accept. But over the past 5-10 years, hard evidence has been produced which is having its effect on the scientific skeptics.
Dr. Karl Pribram, a prominent American brain surgeon, sees the brains neurons "outpicturing" the physical universe, similar to the holographic process. He suggests that our brains are exposed to the entire concept of the universe in the same way that any minute part of a hologram contains basically the same information as the whole.
British scientist, Jacob Boehm came up with the same Holographic Theory and had it published in a prominent scientific journal.
But probably most amazing of all is the mind power theory that British physicist Rupert Sheldrake has proffered. If his theory is proven correct, it will rival Charles Darwin's Theory of evolution in its magnitude.
Basically he has proven repeatedly through laboratory controlled experiments that different species of animals appear to be "plugged" into a dedicated intelligence field which is universal to that particular species.
For example, when enough mice in a group have learned a maze, they ALL suddenly know the maze - whether they have run it or not!
It now appears, after a BBC television experiment, that if enough humans have learned something, then it becomes easier for all humans to learn it. Sheldrake calls this shared intelligence the morphogenetic field.
There is an interesting parable about his called the 100th monkey relating to an apparent observation made on a remote Japanese Island.
A very bright female monkey on a small island was taught to wash sweet potatoes in the seawater. She then taught other members of the tribe to do this. When approximately 100 monkeys had learned this procedure, many other remote monkey tribes started washing potatoes in the same manner. But the interesting thing is that these other tribes were situated on other remote islands and also on the mainland. That is, they had no possible way of acquiring this knowledge, other by some form of intuitive universal "sharing".
The BBC in London tried out Sheldrake's Theory on 8 million of their viewers. They showed on prime time TV, a difficult puzzle that only a very small percentage of their viewers were able to solve. Then the correct answer was also given on prime time TV.

Shortly after, the same experiment was repeated by a TV network in another country. A far higher percentage of these foreign viewers were able to get the puzzle right the first time. As the puzzle was in the form of a universal pictorial concept, language and customs were not considered to be a factor.
The BBC and Sheldrake concluded that as the correct answer was now existing within the human morphogenetic field then the human race now knows the answer. Basically Sheldrake's Theory explains "intuitive" functioning to a degree.
What Sheldrake is saying is that there is a larger mind for each life-form and each individual life-form "programs" that larger mind. The theory might be laughable except for Sheldrake's acceptance in the scientific community and also the BBC experiment.
But probably the most startling (and easily repeatable) experiments came from Cleve Backster, a polygraph (lie detector) expert. Operating from his San Diego, Californian laboratory he found that plants react - at a distance - to human thought - just the power of the mind. He initially connected his polygraph equipment to a Dragon Plant to test for possible plant stress.
He decided to generate stress by burning the plants leaves and sure enough the polygraph machine registered a strong reaction. But he hadn't actually burnt the leaves - he had only intended to do so!
He had thought about it with emotion and intent!
Skeptics who tried the same experiment without genuine intent couldn't get it to work. Backster went a step further and totally shocked the scientific world. He scraped human cells from a volunteer's mouth and connected these to his polygraph and medical EEG equipment. He found to his utter amazement that these cells reacted instantaneously to the donor's emotions, even when they
geographically separated! White blood cells were found to be particularly susceptible to emotion. (This may explain for the first time why people with strong positive emotions have better health).
This intelligence field is the key to probably the most extraordinary part of the advanced mind power research of Jim Francis - his discoveries about our mental connection with this field - also known as the morphogenetic field

Quantum Philosophy: Many Worlds and Mind Over Matter


By Tara Sullivan
BellaOnline's Philosophy Editor

Quantum Physics is one of the most baffling discoveries of the last century. Many interpretations of the experimental data have been proposed and will be proposed as to its meaning. Flying in the face of classical physics, quantum physics has been trying to explain itself ever since it came into the forefront of the scientific community. Classical physics mostly devised the rules of the macro-world, when scientific measurement became increasingly smaller, the scientific community was astounded to realize that the quantum world did not abide by classical deterministic rules. A brief overview of some of the issues
will be discussed and the many-worlds interpretation will ultimately be supported, in tandem with the evidence for decoherence. Conscious thought will be held to be a form of decoherence which ultimately has a causal effect on the quantum level.

In order to understand the nature of reality and the interaction between mind and matter it is necessary to study the metaphysical implications of quantum physics. The dual nature of reality on a microscopic level causes one to wonder if the macroscopic world is not also as it appears. Given that objects at a macroscopic level, such as tables, chairs,oranges, human beings, etc. are made up of microscopic objects (ie. protons, electrons, quarks, etc.), it is reasonable to think that all matter would share physical properties of its microscopic constituents. It may be that macroscopic objects do not have to exhibit a waveparticle duality because this is a behavior which is confined to electrons, but the fact that an observation of an electron’s dual nature effects the state it presents in is inescapable. The relationship of the micro-world to the macro-world is not necessarily one of direct analogy.

But assuming both empirically and intuitively that macroscopic bodies are constituted ofincreasing smaller constituents, assumes that the relations and properties of these constituents will affect the relations and properties of the macro-body in which they play an integral role.

The superficial properties of a table, such as type of wood, color, pattern of the wood grain, how it is varnished or painted are directly linked to the chemical composition of its smaller constituents, and chemical composition is constituted of number of electrons, and states, etc. Color is determined by wavelength reflected, this is empirically and scientifically accepted dogma. So, the interrelationship between microscopic and macroscopic is established.
In a quantum experiment, a stream of electrons when observed will either present itself as a wave function or, if an electron is observed it will present itself as a particle. As soon as the particle is observed by a scientist, the wave function which was previously observed will disappear. Furthermore, it was found that the location where the particle is seen can be determined probabilistically. This was an astounding discovery almost a century ago, because prior to these discoveries it was generally thought that the nature of the physical world could be determined through classical physics. So, this probabilistic nature of the
position of the electron was termed “indeterminacy.”

One feature of indeterminacy is that the state of the electron depends on whether or not it is observed. When an electron is in wave form, it could be in all locations at once, but once observed it collapses into one world, which is probabilistically determined. The fact that the electron’s position is only probable, makes it possible to observe it in locations where one would have no reason to think it might be.
Einstein, for one, did not accept that quantum theory was a complete theory. His
famous words, “God doesn’t play dice,” succinctly describe his resistance to the
seemingly absurd idea that physical reality on the quantum level could be left up to chance. Einstein, and others became proponents of a hidden variables theory of quantum measurement. Surely, this reduction of the measurement problem into a matter of statistics must be because of the crude limitations of our measuring devices or senses, or both? It seems logical that there would be variables that were unaccounted for.

But the uncertainty principle persisted. It became apparent that indeterminacy was not going away, and the philosophical implications were articulated through many interpretations of the quantum measurement data. The Copenhagen interpretation was developed by Neils Bohr who posited two versions to explain the quantum measurement problem. Nick Herbert, in Quantum Reality says of the first revelation of this interpretation: “No one has influenced more our notions of what the quantum world is really about than Danish physicist Neils Bohr, and it is Bohr who puts forth one of quantum physics most outrageous claims: that there is no deep reality. Bohr does not deny the evidence of his senses. The world we see around us is real enough, he affirms, but it floats on a world that is not as real.” (p. 16) The implication of this interpretation is anti-realist, to say the least. There is no underlying structure to phenomena, but only abstract possibility. If everything we experience is built upon a foundation of abstract possibility then how do we explain the coherence of classical mechanics and our solid experience of matter in the macro-world?
SOURCE: Bella Online
More headlines at www.mindpowernews.com

Will Science Ever Find God?



A prize-winning quantum physicist says a spiritual reality is veiled from us, and science offers a glimpse behind that veil. So how do scientists investigating the fundamental nature of the universe assess any role of God, asks Mark Vernon.
By Mark Vernon / Source: BBC
The Templeton Prize, awarded for contributions to "affirming life's spiritual dimension", has been won by French physicist Bernard d'Espagnat, who has worked on quantum physics with some of the most famous names in modern science.
Quantum physics is a hugely successful theory: the predictions it makes about the behaviour of subatomic particles are extraordinarily accurate. And yet, it raises profound puzzles about reality that remain as yet to be understood.

The bizarre nature of quantum physics has attracted some speculations that are wacky but the theory suggests to some serious scientists that reality, at its most basic, is perfectly compatible with what might be called a spiritual view of things.
Some suggest that observers play a key part in determining the nature of things. Legendary physicist John Wheeler said the cosmos "has not really happened, it is not a phenomenon, until it has been observed to happen."
D'Espagnat worked with Wheeler, though he himself reckons quantum theory suggests something different. For him, quantum physics shows us that reality is ultimately "veiled" from us.
The equations and predictions of the science, super-accurate though they are, offer us only a glimpse behind that veil. Moreover, that hidden reality is, in some sense, divine. Along with some philosophers, he has called it "Being".
In an effort to seek the answers to the "meaning of physics", I spoke to five leading scientists.
1. THE ATHEIST
Nobel-prize winning physicist Steven Weinberg is well-known as an atheist. For him, physics reflects the "chilling impersonality" of the universe.
He would be thinking here of, say, the vast tracts of empty space, billions of light years across, that mock human meaning.
He says: "The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it seems pointless."
So for Weinberg, the notion that there might be an overlap between science and spirituality is entirely mistaken.
2. THE SCEPTIC
The Astronomer Royal and President of the Royal Society, Martin Rees, shows a distinct reserve when speculating about what physics might mean, whether that be pointlessness or meaningfulness.
He has "no strong opinions" on the interpretation of quantum theory: only time will tell whether the theory becomes better understood.
"The implications of cosmology for these realms of thought may be profound, but diffidence prevents me from venturing into them," he has written.
In short, it is good to be humble in the face of the mysteries that physics throws up.
3. THE PLATONIST
Oxford physicist Roger Penrose differs again. He believes that mathematics suggests there is a world beyond the immediate, material one.
Ask yourself this question: would one plus one equal two even if I didn't think it? The answer is yes.
Would it equal two even if no-one thought it? Again, presumably, yes.
Would it equal two even if the universe didn't exist? That is more tricky to contemplate, but again, there are good grounds for a positive response.
Penrose, therefore, argues that there is what can be called a Platonic world beyond the material world that "contains" mathematics and other abstractions.
4. THE BELIEVER
John Polkinghorne worked on quantum physics in the first part of his career, but then took up a different line of work: he was ordained an Anglican priest. For him, science and religion are entirely compatible.
The ordered universe science reveals is only what you'd expect if it was made by an orderly God. However, the two disciplines are different. He calls them "intellectual cousins".
"Physics is showing the world to be both more supple and subtle, but you need to be careful," he says.
If you want to understand the meaning of things you have to go beyond science, and the religious direction is, he argues, the best.
5. THE PANTHEIST
Brian Swimme is a cosmologist, and with the theologian Thomas Berry, wrote a book called The Universe Story: From the Primordial Flaring Forth to the Ecozoic Era.
It is avidly read by individuals in New Age and ecological circles, and tells the scientific story of the universe, from the Big Bang to the emergence of human consciousness, but does so as a new sacred myth.
Swimme believes that "the universe is attempting to be felt", which makes him a pantheist, someone who believes the cosmos in its entirety can be called God.
RELATED ARTICLE: Scientific Evidence of a Living, Conscious Universe

وائل الكومي سفاح الإسكندرية إترقى يا رجالة....حد يقوللي مبارك راجع إمتى!ا


@ShadyyM 


Shady Ahmed 





Thursday, July 14, 2011

فضيحة صحيفة الأهرام الجديدة 11-7-2011



في فضيحة "تعبيرية" جديدة للأهرام قام أحد مستخدمي موقع تويتر بعمل حساب اسمه باراك اوباما بالعربية وسمى نفسه باراك حسين     اوباما :
@BarackObama_ar
وكل تويتاته عبارة عن نكت أو سخرية ومع ذلك نقلت صحفية من جريدة الأهرام كلامه على أنه كلام الرئيس الأمريكي باراك أوباما! بل وأكدت في الخبر على أن الرئيس الأمريكي قام بعمل هذا الحساب على تويتر للتواصل مع الشرق الأوسط ومتحدثي العربية في فزلكة صحفية رائعة منها.

مستندات أمريكية تكشف: مبارك والعادلي سلما المباحث الفيدرالية أرشيف الرقم القومي للمصريين



http://www.rosaonline.net/Daily/News.asp?id=118263
كارثة حقيقية كشفتها مستندات سرية أمريكية حيث أكدت أن الرئيس المخلوع حسني مبارك ووزير داخليته حبيب العادلي قاما بتسليم المباحث الفيدرالية جميع بيانات المصريين التي يتضمنها أرشيف الرقم القومي وقاعدة البصمات والتسجيل الجنائي.

هذا ما كشفته مستندات تحمل شعار «سري للغاية» تم تسريبها من المباحث الفيدرالية الأمريكية مؤخرا لتوثق ما جاء في ملفات ويكيليكس لتؤكد وجود تعاون خطير قام به وزير الداخلية الاسبق حبيب العادلي بموافقة الرئيس المخلوع حسني مبارك عندما سلم سرا في إبريل عام 2009 أرشيف الرقم القومي وقاعدة بيانات البصمات والتسجيل الجنائي المصري للمباحث الفيدرالية بعد أن رفض السيد عمر سليمان مدير المخابرات العامة المصرية الاسبق ومن ورائه اللواء حسن عبد الرحمن رئيس مباحث أمن الدولة المنحل تسليمه لأمريكا علي مدي أعوام خدمتيهما.

الواقعة تمثل كارثة حقيقية تكاد تصل حد «العمالة» حيث نجد لها تعريفا في قاموس علم المخابرات الذي يتضمن الوصف السادس للعميل بأنه «يعمل في النظام الحكومي أو في منظومة أمنية للدولة التي يتجسس عليها أو يعمل ضد مصالحها ولا يمكن الشك في مصداقيته أو وطنيته من شعبه».

المستندات السرية تثبت أن أجهزة المخابرات الأمريكية بأنواعها ومن ورائها أجهزة مخابرات عديدة بالعالم كانت دائما تسعي للحصول علي ذلك الأرشيف وأنها لا تزال تري أن قاعدة بيانات الأرشيف المصري الأمني تعد من أغلي وأكثر أرشيفات العالم نظاما وغزارة في المعلومات بغض النظر عن تلك الأساليب التي جمع بواسطتها، وأن صول ذلك الأرشيف للأجهزة الأمريكية كان يعد تطورا نوعيا وخطيرا فيما أطلقوا عليه الحرب علي الإرهاب لكن الأخطر هو حقيقة التعامل والتعاون الذي انغمس فيه المخلوع ووزير داخليته مع أجهزة مخابرات العالم المختلفة علي حساب الأمن القومي المصري.

الزمان كان في 13 إبريل 2009 الساعة السابعة مساء عندما وقف أمام بوابة وزارة الداخلية عدد كبير من لواءات الوزارة بملابسهم الرسمية وثلاث عربات كل ما بها أسود تحمل لوحات تتبع السفارة الأمريكية بالقاهرة تشق طريقها في هدوء كامل عابرة شارع الشيخ ريحان بوسط القاهرة متجهة لمبني مقر وزارة الداخلية وما تكاد تصل لتقاطع شارعي الشيخ ريحان ومنصور حتي تسد الطرقات من جميع المنافذ وتجد بوابات الوزارة مفتوحة علي مصارعيها وما أن تدخل حتي تغلق البوابات ويبدأ من بداخلها الهبوط منها تفتح الأبواب الثلاثة للعربة الأولي أولا ويهبط رجل يتنسم الهواء الجميل الذي حملته الرياح في مدينة القاهرة عشية ذلك اليوم المعتدل، ذلك الرجل هو روبرت مويلر مدير المباحث الفيدرالية الأمريكية الشهير والذي يشغل المنصب منذ4 سبتمبر 2001، ومن الباب الثاني تهبط سيدة يعرفها الجميع وهي السيدة مارجريت سكوبي سفيرة الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية بالقاهرة بداية من 23 يناير 2008، وعلي السجادة الحمراء المفروشة أمام مدخل البوابة المؤدية لمكتب وزير الداخلية حبيب العادلي يتخلي الحرس الأمريكي عن قيادة الطريق ليصطحب ضباط العلاقات العامة المصريون الزوار مباشرة لمكتب «العادلي».

في الخلفية يتضح لنا بعض الحقائق فقد طلب الوفد الأمريكي بناء علي رغبة مدير المباحث الفيدرالية «الأمريكية» مويلر لقاء «العادلي» ومدير مباحث أمن الدولة المنحل اللواء حسن عبد الرحمن كل علي حدة وفي عدم حضور الطرف الآخر ، أما الخلفية السياسية فهي توتر شديد في العلاقات بين البلدين بسبب الرفض الأمريكي القاطع لسياسة التعذيب المتبعة في مصر بشكل منهجي، ويحمل «مويلر» في يده ملفا سميكا وثقت فيه الإدارة الأمريكية العديد من عمليات التعذيب.

وقبل زيارتهما لوزارة الداخلية قابلا وزير الخارجية أحمد أبوالغيط حيث نفي حدوث التعذيب في مصر فأخرج له مدير المباحث الفيدرالية الأمريكية «مويلر» وثائق مصرية حكومية تفيد- طبقا للمستندات السرية الأمريكية الجديدة- بأن وزارة الداخلية ونظام مبارك قد توقفا في عام 2004 عن نفي حقيقة وجود تعذيب في مصر وأن هناك نسخة من اتفاقية أمنية وقعت بين مصر وأمريكا وموقع عليها حبيب العادلي تشترط عقد لقاءاً سنوي دوري بين المباحث الفيدرالية الأمريكية وأمن الدولة في مصر لبحث الملفات الحساسة بين البلدين، وأن الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية كانت قد حصلت علي اعتراف من مبارك نفسه بوجود التعذيب، لكنه أعلن لهم أنه في أضيق الحدود وضد العلميات الإرهابية فقط.

الوفد الأمريكي اطلع أبوالغيط علي معلومات أخري حيث قدموا له توثيقا لتقديم 18 ضابطا مصريا للمحاكمات الجنائية في الفترة من 2004 حتي 2007 بتهم التعذيب وأن منهم من صدرت ضده أحكام نافذة بالسجن لمدد تراوحت بين عام وخمسة عشر عاما، بل إنهم طلبوا من «أبوالغيط» الذي بدا كأنه أول مرة يري تلك المعلومات تفسيرا علي عدم تنفيذ النظام المصري لاتفاقية سياسية سرية وقعت بين الإدارة الأمريكية وحسني مبارك علي وقف العمل بقانون الطوارئ في مجلس الشعب بموعد نهائي في 2008، وأن مبارك أعلن لأمريكا قبل أن يوقع لهم أن أعضاء المجلس الـ454 سيوافقون علي وقف قانون الطوارئ عندما يأمرهم بذلك في الموعد المحدد.

«مبارك» طلب مهلة لتوفير قانون جديد لما سمي بقانون الإرهاب وكان محتارا في إيجاد قانون يكون أشد خطورة علي مصر من قانون الطوارئ لكنهم طبقا للمستندات السرية للغاية فاجأوه بملف تحريات أمريكي أمني منفصل يفيد بوجود معلومات غريبة حول تورط «العادلي» في أحداث الإرهاب أو أنه هو من ضغط بسياساته القمعية وأدي لتلك الأحداث وأوراقهم جاء فيها: "في 2005 عملية تفجير ثلاثية في شرم الشيخ توقع 88 قتيلا و200 جريح ومصر كلها يغلق الأمن قبضته عليها- في 2006 عملية إرهابية وتفجير ثلاثي في مدينة دهب السياحية بجنوب سيناء توقع 24 قتيلاذ وفي فبراير تفجير إرهابي في خان الخليلي يوقع قتيلا شابا فرنسيا" ، ويطرح الوفد الأمريكي التحريات علي مبارك فلا يكون منه إلا أن يطلب منهم لقاء «العادلي» و«عبد الرحمن» ويعلن موافقته علي أي طلب يطلبونه منه حتي يغلقوا ذلك الموضوع فتكون الفرصة بالنسبة لهم.

من هنا وجد الوفد الأمريكي الطريق ممهداً تماما لتحقيق مطلب أمريكي مهم بالنسبة لأجهزة المخابرات الأمريكية وهو نسخة من أرشيف الرقم القومي المصري ونسخة من قاعدة بيانات السجل الجنائي والمدني للمصريين بدعوي أن أمريكا تحتاج تلك البيانات لتكون تحت أيديها لدي التحقيق في أي قضايا تتعلق بالإرهاب كي تكون تحقيقاتهم سريعة وعلي أساس معلومات غزيرة كتلك الموجودة في قواعد بيانات أمن الدولة المصري حتي أنهم أشاروا يومها إلي أن ذلك الأرشيف لم يوثق فقط للمصريين بل وثق لمواطني دول الاتحاد الروسي وباكستان وأفغانستان وبه نسبة كبيرة لمواطنين من دول عربية أخري، ومن هنا كانت أهمية المطالبة بالحصول علي نسخة منه.

في لقائهم بمبارك هددوه ضمنيا بأنهم سينشرون بالعالم التحقيقات حول العمليات الإرهابية ومعلوماتهم عنها خاصة أن تلك العمليات قد راح ضحيتها أجانب يمكن أن يقلبوا الدنيا علي النظام المصري لو وصلوا لمجرد الشك، وأن «العادلي» كان يلعب في الخفاء.

الغريب أن المستند يثبت وجود معلومات عجيبة عن حقيقة انفصال ولو جزئي في سياسة عمل حسن عبد الرحمن وحبيب العادلي فبينما نري أن العادلي، يعمل مزدوجا دائما مع مبارك الذي يحركه نجد حسن عبدالرحمن وقد بدا متماسكا أمام الطلب الأمريكي، ونتأكد من المستندات أنه رفض تسليمهم الأرشيف الأمني المصري علي مدي طيلة أعوام خدمته بل نجد في ذات المستندات أنهم تقابلوا أيضا مع عمر سليمان مدير المخابرات العامة المصرية وقد أعلن عن رفض المخابرات الصريح للطلب الأمريكي لكنه طلب منهم مناقشة مبارك والعادلي حيث إن القرار هو في النهائية قرار سيادي للرئيس والتنفيذ منفردا للعادلي الذي يقع تحت تصرفه الأرشيف المصري.

المستندات تؤكد أن مبارك طلب «العادلي» وشرح له في لقاء خاص بينهما خطورة الملف الذي وثقوه وأنه لا مانع من تسليم الأرشيف طالما أنهم لن يقدموه لدولة أخري وسيستخدم في خدمة العالم ضد الإرهاب، ووافق العادلي علي الفور لكنه طلب من مبارك إشراك عبد الرحمن في الموضوع، حيث يقع الأرشيف أيضا في حيازته، لكن «مبارك» طبقا للمستندات أخطر العادلي بأن عبد الرحمن وسليمان يتعاملان بوطنية زائدة عن اللزوم علي حد وصف مبارك للموضوع الذي جاء سرده في المستندات، وطلب من العادلي عمل اللازم بعيدا عن عبدالرحمن.

مستند آخر يثبت أن مدير المباحث الفيدرالية الأمريكية روبرت مويلر في زيارته للقاهرة في الفترة من 8 إلي 9 فبراير 2006، تقابل في حضور فرانسيس ريتشارد دوني السفير الأمريكي الأسبق بالقاهرة مع مبارك و العادلي وعبد الرحمن وسليمان طلب منهم توسيع حجم الاتفاقية الأمنية بين مباحث أمن الدولة والمباحث الفيدرالية الأمريكية وعرض عليهم تبادل الأرشيف الأمني الجنائي والمدني العراقي بالمصري غير أنهم لم يبدوا اهتماما يومها ووافقوا علي توسيع التعاون فيما يخص توفير الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية لمنح تدريبية أكبر لأعضاء الجهاز حيث نجد أن معظمهم قد حصلوا علي دورات تدريبية متقدمة في أمريكا وأنهم عمليا ورسميا يحملون أكبر الشهادات المهنية في المجال بل تفوقوا علي ضباط العالم.

بيانات اللقاءات نجد فيها كماً هائلاً من الحديث عن تحدث «مبارك» و«العادلي» دائما عن مدي خطورة الإخوان المسلمين علي مصر بل إننا نفاجأ عندما نري أن الحديث عن الإخوان كان يأخذ فعلا أكثر من ثلثي وقت كل لقاء وأن الأمريكان كانوا يأخذون الحديث حجة علي ضرورة تسليم أمريكا الأرشيف المصري كي تستخدمه أمريكا لمحاربة الإخوان مع «مبارك».

معلومة أخري نجدها في المستندات حاول عن طريقها مبارك أن يراوغ في 2006 لعدم تسليم الأرشيف فقد اقترح عليهم يومها إرسال عمر سليمان لدمشق كي يطلب من قيادة حماس وقف العمليات الفلسطينية علي إسرائيل وأن مبارك لو نجح في ذلك ستكون تلك هي هديته للنظام الأمريكي ويكون قد قام بما عليه كشريك للولايات المتحدة.

زيارة أخري تمت ونجد بياناتها في ذات المستندات بين الطرفين في 28 نوفمبر 2007، طالبوا فيها أيضا بالحصول علي الأرشيف المصري لأهميته بالنسبة لحربهم علي الإرهاب ولم تخل الجلسة من الحديث عن خطورة الإخوان المسلمين وضرورة أن تساعد الأجهزة الأمريكية نظام مبارك للتغلب عليها.

«العالي» عاد لمكتبه وهو مصمم علي توريط عبدالرحمن فطلبه لمكتبه مرة أخيرة للتشاور حول الموضوع وفي اللقاء يسرد المستند أن عبد الرحمن علي عكس باقي مساعدي العادلي لم يكن يخشاه بل كان يعد داخل بالوزارة أقوي من العادلي نفسه وفي اللقاء رفض عبد الرحمن تسليم الأرشيف المصري وهدده بفضحه وطلب منه أن يعرض عليهم أن تقوم أمن الدولة بنفسها بالكشف عمن يريدون الكشف عنه وأن عبد الرحمن سيعد بعمل الكشف في دقائق وأن النتيجة ستصلهم بعدها بساعات قليلة وذلك حتي يخرج العادلي من الضغط، فطلب منه الأخير الانصراف.

تثبت المستندات أن العادلي قد قرر التصرف منفردا ودبر للوفد الأمريكي ما طلبوه بدون أن يعلم أي مسئول بوزارة الداخلية حتي عبد الرحمن نفسه ظل ليوم خروجه من الوزارة لا يعلم أن الأرشيف قد سلمه العادلي لهم بشرط عدم استغلاله بصورة تضر بمصر.

والمعروف أن هذا الأرشيف يقع داخل شبكة أمنية داخلية لا يمكن الدخول عليها من خارج البلاد أو مثلا كيف ستحصل المباحث الفيدرالية علي التحديثات في ذلك الأرشيف وهي المعلومات اليومية التي تطرأ علي الأرشيفين بالتحديث بالحذف والإضافة؟ أسئلة حائرة لم نجد لها جوابا في المستندات التي اكتفت بالسرد.

المستندات أكدت أن هناك اتفاقا مكتوبا وقع سرا بين العادلي والطرف الأمريكي غير أن أحدا لم يجد نص ذلك الاتفاق حتي الآن سواء في حوزة العادلي أو بين المستندات التي تركها الرئيس المخلوع ليبقي الموضوع مجرد سرد في مستندات سرية للغاية سربت من المباحث الفيدرالية الأمريكية. 

تعليق:



    •  مش غريبة لإن عمر سليمان كان عايز يبعت اصابع احد المعتقلين في السجون المصرية إلي المخابرات الامريكية بعد ان طلبوا البصمات !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! فقلهم الراجل الأهبل كما تكشف وثائق ويكي ليكس لو تحبوا ابعتلكم صوابعه نفسها ، مش غريية علي العالم دي انها تعمل أي حاجة ، أي حاجة ممكن اصدقها عليها لإنهم ببساطة أسوأ من حكم مصر علي مدي تاريخها و لم أسمع عن أسوأ منهم حتي عندما كانت مصر تحت الإحتلال !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!